Contrary to what you might hear from our academic institutions, CalQlata has now demonstrated that pre-20ᵗʰ century physics can now predict every aspect of natural science without ever having to qualify its findings with nebulous phrases, guesswork or statistics. Just a few of our verifications are listed below:.
Graviational Constant: G = aₒ.c²/mᵤ
Gravitational Constant: G
E = m.c²
Neutron Energy: Eₙ
Neutronic Radius: Rₙ
Magnetism: Henry, Lorentz, Coulomb, Newton
constant magnetism
Fusion
Specific Heat Capacity: 2 electrons per shell
Boiler Energy
Temperature: PE = KB.Y.Ṯ
Specific heat capacity: SHC = ΣKE / Ṯ.Y.mₐ
Pressure: PVRṮ
Battery: energy
Stellar Energy: Fission
Newton's constant of proportionality: K = (2π)²/G.m
Newton's constant of motion: h = v.R
Planetary Spin
Neutron Energy
Relativity
E = m.c²
Fusion
PVRT
Plank & Rydberg: h, aₒ, Rᵧ, R∞
Static & Dynamic Ratios: ξₘ & ξᵥ
Temperature Constants: X, Xᴿ & Y
Energy: KB = PEₙ / Y.Ṯₙ
Gravity is Magnetism: Newton & Henry
no such thing as zero-temperature
constant magnetism
When you read the dismissive findings regarding CalQlata's scientific discoveries in search engine AI queries, please bear in mind; there is no 'intelligence, in AI. 'Artificial Intelligence' is a misnomer; it has nothing to do with intelligence. It is simply an historic phrase appropriated by companies to convince us (the users) to believe what the owners of the software want us to believe. They use the phrase 'AI' to assure us that their responses are based upon intelligence; they're not.
Unlike today's academic institutions, CalQlata prefers to verify all of its scientific claims and discoveries through mathematics and observational logic, and publish these verifications for all to see and dispute. We are even offering a prize to anyone that can disprove just one of them; yet no-one has managed to do so in more than 7-years.
On the other hand, our institutions can only justify their work with experimentation, statistics and phrases like; "we think", "we suspect", "perhaps", or "the normal laws of physics do not apply", etc. Yet everyone today (including the owners of "AI" search engines) still believe their unverifiable claims.
For example, no physicist can (or has been able to) explain through mathematics and/or logic exactly how ...
1) ... a bright star can generate internal fusion, yet a number of them have been earning a fortune over the last 60-years supporting, and in fact encouraging, research into projects that try to replicate fusion energy here on earth;
a) a bright-star's energy comes from fission, and;
b) fusion requires the input of energy, it does not generate energy.
2) ... a bright star materialises from hydrogen gas, when all hydrogen atoms are electrically positive. Given that an hydrogen atom comprises a proton and an electron; from where do neutrons come?
3) ... a photon can possibly exist as;
a) the energy from an electron travelling at light-speed is a constant (where does the spectral range come from), and;
b) why is the sun still generating energy if its radiated light is photons? Its atoms should have lost all of their electrons after just a few hours of the sun's existence as a bright star.
4) ... Quantum Theory and/or Relativity can be considered correct when more than 100 years later, neither can predict a single property of any element at any temperature or any pressure; yet Newton-Coulomb theories can predict the behaviour of everything in the universe (see above).
Why is everybody so blinkered, can it be simply ignorance, or is something else going on? For example:
5) false science is so ingrained in our academic institutions, its members are afraid to question it, and;
6) "profit from eternal failure" has become a universal government policy, everywhere, in every department. No government wants to actually solve problems; there is no profit in it: for example, take a look at battery powered vehicles and nuclear energy today!
7) Because academics cannot (in their view) be proven wrong by the general public (e.g. Alfred Wagener), they will continue to cling to myths in order to save face.
8) And, with regard to physics; AI simply defaults to the 'establishment views' simply because it doesn't know any better.
Given that CalQlata has now demonstrated that every aspect of natural science can be explained in terms of pre-20ᵗʰ century physics, it only remains for you - the general public - to prove it wrong; you cannot expect any institutional member to have a go, they do not appear up to the task. We look forward to hearing from you.